![]() Organizations of current and former athletes - including cannabis activist group Athletes For CARE and the National Football League Players Association, the union that represents NFL players - have called for leagues to allow cannabis-based alternatives to addictive painkillers.Įarlier this year, the NFL and the NFLPA agreed to explore studying the pain management effects of cannabis.Įmployees tend to marijuana plants at the Aurora Cannabis Inc. The subject is an increasingly hot one in professional sports leagues. Jeff Chen, director of UCLA’s Cannabis Research Initiative. The efforts would be first of their kind in the research of how elite athletes could potentially benefit from cannabis or cannabis-derived compounds, according to Dr. Aurora and the UFC plan to conduct clinical trials on the use of cannabidiol, commonly known as CBD, in elite athletes and then employ the results to develop a line of hemp-derived CBD topical treatments targeting elite athletes.Īurora and UFC officials say they hope the studies will show the effectiveness of CBD and specific formulations of the compound in areas such as wound care, recovery, injury, pain and inflammation. The research is part of a partnership between the professional mixed martial arts league and Canadian company Aurora Cannabis No cash balance or cash flow is included in the calculation.Ultimate Fighting Championship athletes will serve as test subjects to find out if the cannabis compound CBD can treat the aches and pains that come hand in hand with their violent sport. Please note all regulatory considerations regarding the presentation of fees must be taken into account. Backtested results are adjusted to reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other income and, except where otherwise indicated, are presented gross-of fees and do not include the effect of backtested transaction costs, management fees, performance fees or expenses, if applicable. Actual performance may differ significantly from backtested performance. Further, backtesting allows the security selection methodology to be adjusted until past returns are maximized. Since trades have not actually been executed, results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity, and may not reflect the impact that certain economic or market factors may have had on the decision-making process. Specifically, backtested results do not reflect actual trading or the effect of material economic and market factors on the decision-making process. ![]() Backtested performance is developed with the benefit of hindsight and has inherent limitations. This information is provided for illustrative purposes only. ![]() ![]() No representations and warranties are made as to the reasonableness of the assumptions. Certain assumptions have been made for modeling purposes and are unlikely to be realized. Changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on the backtested returns presented. General assumptions include: XYZ firm would have been able to purchase the securities recommended by the model and the markets were sufficiently liquid to permit all trading. Backtested results are calculated by the retroactive application of a model constructed on the basis of historical data and based on assumptions integral to the model which may or may not be testable and are subject to losses. The results reflect performance of a strategy not historically offered to investors and does not represent returns that any investor actually attained. Backtested performance is not an indicator of future actual results. Disclaimer: The TipRanks Smart Score performance is based on backtested results.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |